| David Pierce
on "Contradictions", New York 2008 |
Street art and public works are now
widely accepted in high art circles and are held to higher standards
than in the past. If a statement or mural is placed in to the public
it is in a sense forced on to the public. What must this art say
or do if the viewer did not choose to participate? If one were to
start shouting in public there are expectations that the shouter
should have something important to say or the public will view them
as insane or irrelevant. Making a work public and even breaking
the law to do so is no longer a sublime act of rebellion in itself.
Street art is a contradiction in today’s contemporary art
world. A nuisance to some, a legitimate work of art to others the
works are subject to the standards and tastes of the art world and
the tastes and temperament of the wider world. Italian artist Fillipi
Minelli plays with contradictions in society and his medium masterfully.
His series ‘contradictions’ examines the way in which
corporations have appropriated nature and intervened in the human
and natural world. By intervening directly in a space, the works
comment on our intervention and our relationship with earth’s
new ecosystems. Humans have changed the natural world irreversibly.
The earth’s ecosystems are evolving and developing ways to
tolerate or possibly eradicate their human intruders.
Minelli is based out of Brescia Italy, a picturesque suburb of Milan
near the foot of the Alps. His public works though, stretch well
beyond his home base. In fact the breadth of his travel is impressive
enough in it’s own right. But in the case of the “Contradictions”
series the location of the works are crucial to their conceptual
nature. Our human impulse to construct meaning out of art lends
itself to street art. We react to what is clever and generally allow
the work to be satirical and unflattering of our lives and ourselves.
Humans do indeed like to laugh at themselves. Nowadays without a
punch line public art will be reduced to being viewed as graffiti
or a nuisance. Public art that can be viewed as important in a contemporary
sense has come a long way from the Basquiat days when it was enough
to merely evoke the glamour of the act. The rebellion of the act
alone demanded little more of the artist than to simply write their
name or leave a mark. Aptly trained by graffiti superstars like
Banksy, the contemporary viewer demands a clever statement if work
is to steal the audience’s attention or gain acceptance.
Minelli’s contradictions series is aware of the demands of
the viewer and hands them a mirror. Look at yourselves. Look at
the whole world. What do you think? Do you like what you see? Facebook,
Myspace etc are global corporate constructs. This is a human reality
that touches every part of the globe. But, who benefits? Are we
mimicking the structures of the industrial revolution? Who are the
winners and the losers? The story always seems to be the same. The
countries that have the research and development gain while the
countries that manufacture tend to suffer. Facebook flourishes in
California but the chips that power the servers and computers of
the sites users are made all over the world, normally in the developing
world.
The works themselves are economical statements. Executing this is
a simple matter of spray-painting the name of a corporate entity
(often a tech company or popular website’s name) in a public
space. A gesture this simple can be passed off as a one-liner or
juvenile trickery. What makes the work compelling is the context.
Painting the word ‘facebook’ on a wall in Silicone Valley
would be a meaningless gesture. Painted in a scrap yard in Mali
and the gesture takes on a life in itself. Corporations such as
myspace and facebook have such an intangible product that is interesting
to see the connection made with the developing centers where the
chips and hardware are often manufactured.
The shear breadth of Minelli’s travels is enough to be marveled
at. His interventions in advertising and the public space can be
found all over the world. Where he chooses to paint speaks to the
relationship the developing world has with developed countries and
what relationship all humans have with nature.
|